ABSTRACT
Hintergrund: Über das Risiko einer Virusinfektion mit dem schweren akuten Atemwegssyndrom Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) bei Krebspatienten, von denen viele immungeschwächt und damit anfälliger für eine Vielzahl von Infektionen sind, ist sehr wenig bekannt. Als Vorsichtsmaßnahme haben viele klinische Studien während der ersten Welle der weltweiten Pandemie des neuartigen Coronavirus (COVID-19) die Aufnahme von Patienten pausiert. In diesem Fallbericht beschreiben wir die erfolgreiche Behandlung eines Patienten mit rezidiviertem und refraktärem Multiplem Myelom (MM), der unmittelbar nach der klinischen Genesung von COVID-19 mit einer chimären Antigenrezeptor (CAR)-T-Zelltherapie mit Anti-B-Zellreifungsantigen (BCMA) behandelt wurde. Fallvorstellung: Der 57-jährige weiße männliche Patient war seit 4 Jahren an MM erkrankt und galt bei der Vorstellung zur CAR-T-Zelltherapie als pentarefraktär. Er hatte eine Immunsuppression in seiner medizinischen Vorgeschichte und er erhielt am Tag vor der COVID-19-Diagnose eine Dosis lymphdepletierender Chemotherapie (LDC). Dieser Patient konnte eine erhebliche Immunantwort gegen das SARS-CoV-2-Virus aufbauen, und antivirale Antikörper bleiben auch 2 Monate nach Erhalt einer Anti-BCMA-CAR-T-Zelltherapie noch nachweisbar. Die kürzliche SARS-CoV-2-Infektion bei diesem Patienten führte nicht zu einer Exazerbation des CAR-T-assoziierten Zytokin-Freisetzungssyndroms (CRS) und umgekehrt führte die CAR-T-Zelltherapie nicht zu Komplikationen im Zusammenhang mit COVID-19. Einen Monat nach der CAR-T-Zell-Infusion wurde bei dem Patienten ein unbestätigtes partielles Ansprechen nach den Kriterien der International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) festgestellt. Schlussfolgerung: Unser Fall liefert einen wichtigen Kontext für die Wahl der Behandlung von MM-Patienten in Zeiten von COVID-19 sowie für die Frage, ob die CAR-T-Therapie auch bei Patienten verabreicht werden kann, die von COVID-19 genesen sind. Da die COVID-19-Pandemie weltweit anhält, ist eine umfangreiche Diskussion über die Entscheidung, ob mit der CAR-T-Zelltherapie fortgefahren werden soll, erforderlich, wobei die potenziellen Risiken und Vorteile der Therapie gegeneinander abgewogen werden müssen. Dieser Fall legt nahe, dass es möglich ist, die Anti-BCMA-CAR-T-Zelltherapie nach der Genesung von COVID-19 erfolgreich abzuschließen. Die Studie CRB-402 wurde am 6. September 2017 bei clinicaltrials.gov registriert (NCT03274219).
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Despite recent advances, MM remains incurable and new therapeutic options are needed, particularly for pts with RRMM. IBER is a novel, potent oral cereblon E3 ligase modulator (CELMoD ®) compound with enhanced tumoricidal and immune-stimulatory effects compared with immunomodulatory (IMiD ®) agents. Preclinically, IBER demonstrated marked synergy with DEX and with other standard myeloma treatments. CC-220-MM-001 (NCT02773030) is an ongoing phase 1/2 study evaluating IBER with different treatment combinations in independent cohorts of pts with RRMM;in phase 1, the recommended phase 2 dose of IBER, when given in combination with DEX, was determined at 1.6 mg (Lonial S, et al. Blood 2019;134[suppl 1]:3119). Here we report results from the dose expansion of IBER + DEX in pts with heavily pretreated, triple-class exposed (including ≥ 1 IMiD agent, ≥ 1 proteasome inhibitor [PI], and ≥ 1 anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody [mAb]) RRMM. Methods: Eligible pts had RRMM;had received ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy, including lenalidomide (LEN), pomalidomide (POM), a PI, a glucocorticoid, and an anti-CD38 mAb;had experienced disease progression within 60 days of last myeloma therapy;and were refractory to an IMiD agent, a PI, a glucocorticoid, and an anti-CD38 mAb. Pts with central nervous system involvement were not eligible. Pts who had received prior anti-BCMA therapy were excluded, but included in a supportive cohort for safety and preliminary efficacy assessment. IBER (1.6 mg) was given orally on days (D) 1-21, in combination with DEX (40 mg;20 mg if > 75 years of age) on D1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 28-day cycle. Thrombo-embolism prophylaxis was mandatory for all pts. Primary objective was to determine efficacy expressed as overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included additional efficacy and safety assessments. Exploratory endpoints included evaluation of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Results: As of June 2, 2021, 107 pts had received IBER + DEX. Median age was 64 (44-83) years;median time since initial diagnosis was 6.9 (1.6-24.5) years. Extramedullary plasmacytomas were present in 25.2% of pts;29.9% of pts had high-risk cytogenetics. Median number of prior regimens was 6 (3-23). All pts were triple-class exposed;prior therapies included autologous stem cell transplantation (78.5%), PIs (100%), IMiD agents (LEN [100%] and POM [100%]), and anti-CD38 mAbs (100%);99.1% of pts were refractory to last myeloma regimen and 97.2% of pts were triple-class refractory. Median follow-up was 7.69 (0.5-17.5) months, with a median number of 4 (1-17) cycles received and 13 (12.1%) pts continuing treatment. Main reason for discontinuation was progressive disease (69.2%). ORR was 26.2%, with 1 (0.9%) stringent complete response, 8 (7.5%) very good partial responses, and 19 (17.8%) partial responses (Table);the clinical benefit rate (≥ minimal response) was 36.4% and disease control rate (≥ stable disease) was 79.4%. Median duration of response was 7.0 (4.5-11.3) months (Table), median progression-free survival was 3.0 (2.8-3.7) months, and median overall survival was 11.2 (9.0-not reached) months. Similar response rates were observed among a cohort of pts also exposed to BCMA therapies (N = 24, Table). Grade (Gr) 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 88 (82.2%) pts. Most frequent (≥ 20% pts) hematologic Gr 3-4 TEAEs were neutropenia (44.9%;and 4.7% febrile neutropenia), anemia (28.0%), thrombocytopenia (21.5%), and leukopenia (20.6%). Gr 3-4 infections were reported in 27.1% of pts;Gr 3-4 pneumonia and COVID-19 occurred in 10.3% and 4.7% of pts, respectively. Occurrence of other Gr 3-4 non-hematologic TEAEs was generally low, including gastrointestinal disorders (5.6%), fatigue (2.8%), rash (1.9%). Fifty-six (52.3%) pts and 20 (18.7%) had IBER dose interruptions and reductions due to TEAEs, respectively. Five (4.7%) pts discontinued due to TEAEs. No pt discontinued IBER due to neutropenia. Overall, HRQoL was maintained in these pts. Conclusions: IBER + DEX demonst ated promising efficacy in pts with heavily pretreated, triple-class exposed and refractory RRMM, as well as in pts who had previously received anti-BCMA therapy;this combination was generally well tolerated and TEAEs were manageable with dose reductions and interruptions. These results support the further development of IBER in MM, including phase 3 trials in combination regimens. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Lonial: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria;AMGEN: Consultancy, Honoraria;Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Merck: Honoraria;BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Popat: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Abbvie, Takeda, Janssen, and Celgene: Consultancy;Takeda: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES;AbbVie, BMS, Janssen, Oncopeptides, and Amgen: Honoraria;Janssen and BMS: Other: travel expenses. Hulin: Sanofi: Honoraria;Celgene/BMS: Honoraria;Janssen: Honoraria;Takeda: Honoraria;abbvie: Honoraria. Jagannath: Legend Biotech: Consultancy;Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy;Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy;Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy;Sanofi: Consultancy;Takeda: Consultancy. Oriol: Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson: Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding;Regeneron: Consultancy;AbbVie: Consultancy;Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding;Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding;GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy;Protocol Intelligence: Consultancy;Janssen: Consultancy;Secura Bio: Consultancy;Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding;Sanofi: Consultancy;AstraZeneca: Consultancy;Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Weisel: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Roche: Honoraria;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Abbvie: Consultancy;Novartis: Honoraria;Pfizer: Honoraria. Minnema: Cilag: Consultancy;Janssen: Consultancy;Alnylam: Consultancy;Celgene: Other: Travel expenses;Kite/Gilead: Consultancy;BMS: Consultancy. Badros: J&J: Research Funding;Janssen: Research Funding;BMS: Research Funding;GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Knop: BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Amgen: Research Funding;Janssen: Consultancy;Oncopeptides: Consultancy;Pfizer: Consultancy;Sanofi: Consultanc . Stadtmauer: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria;Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria;Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria;Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Chen: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Nguyen: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Amin: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Kueenburg: Celgene a BMS company: Current Employment. Peluso: Celgene, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Current Employment. van de Donk: BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria;Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding;Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding;Cellectis: Research Funding;Takeda: Consultancy;Roche: Consultancy;Novartis /bayer/servier: Consultancy.
ABSTRACT
Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) patients are immunocompromised due to defects in humoral/cellular immunity and immunosuppressive therapy. Reports indicate that the antibody (Ab) response in MM after 1 dose of SARS-CoV-2 RNA vaccine is attenuated. The impact of treatment on cellular immunity after vaccination remains unknown. Methods: We analyzed SARS-CoV-2 spike-binding (anti-S) IgG level in 320 MM patients receiving SARS-CoV-2 RNA vaccination. Blood and saliva were taken at multiple time points and compared with serology data of 69 age-matched vaccinated healthcare workers. We profiled SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses in a subset of 45 MM patients and 12 age-matched healthy controls by flow cytometry and ELIspot. All subjects were enrolled in studies approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Results: The 320 patients (median age 68 year) received two-dose RNA vaccines (69.1% BNT162b2, 27.2% mRNA-1273). Median time to diagnosis was 60 months with a median of 2 prior treatment lines (range 0-16). We included 23 patients with smoldering MM. Patients received various treatments at vaccination with 148 (43.8%) on anti-CD38-containing treatment, 36 (11.3%) on BCMA-targeted therapy and 59 (18.4%) not on active treatment (incl. SMM patients). At the last available evaluation prior to vaccination, 131 (40.9%) exhibited a complete response. At data cutoff, a total of 260 patients (81.3%) had anti-S IgG measured >10 days after the second vaccine (median 51 days). Of these, 84.2% mounted measurable anti-S IgG levels (median 149 AU/mL). In the control group, Ab levels were significantly higher (median 300 AU/mL). Ab levels in the vaccinated MM patients with prior COVID-19 were 10-fold higher than those of patients without prior COVID-19 (p<0.001). Repeat Ab measurements up to 60 days after second vaccination confirm delayed and suboptimal IgG kinetics, particularly in patients receiving anti-MM treatment compared to controls (Figure 1). MM patients on active treatment had lower anti-S IgG levels (p=0.004) compared to patients not on therapy (median 70 vs 183 AU/mL). Notably, 41 patients (15.8%) failed to develop detectable anti-S IgG: 24/41 (58.5%) were on anti-CD38, 13/41 (31.7%) on anti-BCMA bispecific Ab therapy and 4/41 (9.8%) >3 months after CAR T. Univariate analysis showed an association of disease-related factors with absence of anti-S IgG: more previous lines of treatment (>3 lines, p=0.035;>5 lines, p=0.009), receiving active MM treatment (p=0.005), grade 3 lymphopenia (p=0.018), receiving anti-CD38 therapy (p=0.042) and receiving BCMA-targeted therapy (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis (corrected for age, vaccine type, lines of treatment, time since diagnosis, response status and lymphopenia) confirmed that anti-CD38 (p=0.005) and BCMA-targeted treatment (p<0.001) are associated with not developing detectable anti-S IgG. Clinical relevance is emphasized by 10 cases of COVID-19 after 1 (n=7) or 2 vaccine doses (n=3, all without anti-S IgG) with 1 patient passing due to respiratory failure. We studied SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses >2 weeks after the second vaccine in 18 MM patients with undetectable anti-S IgG (seronegative), 27 with detectable anti-S IgG (seropositive) and 12 healthy seropositive controls. We found that seropositive MM patients had CD4+CD154+ T cells producing IFNg, TNFa and IL-2 at similar levels as controls, whereas in the seronegative MM cohort CD4 T cell responses were significantly reduced (p<0.005). SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8 T cell responses were overall weaker and not different across cohorts. This data suggests that absence of detectable IgG is associated with suboptimal response of humoral and cellular immunity. Conclusion: MM patients mount a suboptimal IgG response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, with 15.8% of patients without detectable anti-S IgG. Ongoing analyses will highlight durability of serological protection against COVID-19. Additional data on T cell responses and immunophenotyping in the context of vaccination will be upda ed at the meeting. Implications are continuation of non-pharmacological interventions, e.g. masking/social distancing, for vulnerable patients. The findings underscore a need for serological monitoring of MM patients after vaccination and for trials assessing use of prophylactic strategies or studies exploring additional immunization strategies. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Wang: Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy. Chari: Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding;Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Pharmacyclics: Research Funding;GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Secura Bio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Antengene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding;Janssen Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Shattuck Labs: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding;AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cordon-Cardo: Kantaro: Patents & Royalties. Krammer: Kantaro: Patents & Royalties;Merck: Consultancy;Pfizer: Consultancy;Avimex: Consultancy;Seqirus: Consultancy. Jagannath: Legend Biotech: Consultancy;Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy;Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy;Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy;Sanofi: Consultancy;Takeda: Consultancy. Simon: Kantaro: Patents & Royalties. Parekh: Foundation Medicine Inc: Consultancy;Amgen: Research Funding;PFIZER: Research Funding;CELGENE: Research Funding;Karyopharm Inv: Research Funding.
ABSTRACT
Background: There is growing evidence to suggest that continuous monitoring and a proper use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the clinical setting may improve patient care by facilitating doctor-patient communication, promoting individualized supportive care, and increasing patient satisfaction (Velikova, J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(4):714-24;Yang, Support Care Cancer. 2018 Jan;26(1):41-60). This may be of particular importance for patients with MM, a condition characterized by considerable heterogeneity in PROs at different timepoints within a patient's disease journey (TA King et al, Semin Oncol Nurs. 2017;33(3):299-315;R Abonour et al, Ann Hematol. 2018;97(12):2425-36). There is also a growing body of evidence to support that digital platforms in healthcare can have an impact on patients' lives and improve the patient care experience across diverse medical settings. Web-based platforms that provide education and allow patients to track data have demonstrated improvement across a range of PROs measuring empowerment, self-efficacy, and mastery when compared against standard of care in a variety of disease states (MR Fu et al, Internet Interv. 2016;5:56-64;G Bouma et al, Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(7):2075-2083). This may be particularly relevant in light of the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic. Patient-reported outcome data (e.g., symptoms) that can be readily shared with healthcare professionals (HCPs) can support clinical decision making and impact patient outcomes (E Basch et al, JAMA. 2017 Jul 11;318(2):197-8). Data collected through wearables (such as emoji scales and activity) have been shown to be correlated with traditional, validated PRO measures in patients with cancer (CA Thompson et al, Blood. 2017;130(Suppl 1):2179). Digital medication tracking has led to better medication adherence, increased prescription refills, and better clinical outcomes. Centralized disease management digital platforms have shown potential to reduce patients’ risk of complications (S Kumar et al, Abstract for the 77th American Diabetes Association. 2017). Despite this body of evidence supporting the potential impact of the use of digital platforms, there is little evidence specifically in MM. The MyHOPE™ for MM Solution is a validated investigational digital technology platform designed to provide patients with a comprehensive set of tools and resources to support the patient throughout their overall experience with MM and to collect biometrics and self-reported data such as symptom tracking, medication adherence, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with the ability to share this data with the patient's care team. MyHOPE™ for MM is the first prospective study evaluating the impact of a digital intervention for patients with hematological malignancies. Study Design and Methods: This is a multi-center, randomized, pilot trial of the MyHOPE™ for MM Solution. Approximately 126 adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) with a diagnosis of MM and who reside in the USA will be recruited from approximately 30 study sites within the USA, reflecting both community and academic centers. Patients will be stratified according to disease status (newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma transplant-eligible or ineligible, newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma in patients undergoing their first autologous stem cell transplant, or relapsed and/or refractory) and will be randomized in a 2:1 manner to either the Patient App + HCP Portal (Cohort 1) or Patient App Alone (Cohort 2). Primary objectives include feasibility of the platform and patient empowerment and self-efficacy. Other objectives include user satisfaction with the platform, health-related quality of life, and clinical outcomes. Enrolled patients will receive MM-treament regimen according to their physician's care plan. The study is in start-up and recruitment is expected through 2021. Disclosures: Raje: Celgene: Consultancy. Nadeem: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Direct rs or advisory committees;Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES;Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES. Mikhael: Amgen, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, Sanofi, Takeda: Honoraria. Ludwig: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Agarwal: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Inumerable: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Ong: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Jagannath: BMS, Janssen, Karyopharm, Legend Biotech, Sanofi, Takeda: Consultancy.
ABSTRACT
Background Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by expression of the cell surface protein B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), a validated target for therapeutic intervention. REGN5458 is a BCMA x CD3 bispecific antibody (Ab) that binds to both BCMA and CD3, thereby targeting MM cells with T-cell effector function via BCMA. Previously, we presented data showing REGN5458 has an acceptable safety profile with evidence of clinical efficacy in heavily pre-treated patients with RRMM. Here we describe the updated safety and response durability in a Phase 1 trial of REGN5458 monotherapy in patients with RRMM (NCT03761108). Methods The primary objectives of the Phase 1 portion of the study are to determine the safety, tolerability, and occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of REGN5458. Key secondary objectives include assessment of objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), minimum residual disease (MRD) status, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics. Enrollment into the Phase 1 portion follows a standard 4+3 dose escalation design. Enrolled patients must have progressive MM after ≥3 prior lines of systemic therapy, including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory agent, and an anti-CD38 Ab. Treatment consists of weekly doses of REGN5458, followed by a maintenance phase administered every 2 weeks. Response assessments are according to modified International Myeloma Working Group criteria. MRD is assessed by flow cytometry. Results As of the June 15, 2020 data cut-off, 45 patients were treated with REGN5458. The median age at enrollment was 64.0 years (range, 41−81), of which 14 (31.1%) patients were >70 years. As per Revised International Staging System, 60.0% and 22.2% of patients were stage 2 and 3, respectively. Patients had a median of 5.0 (range, 2−17) prior lines of systemic therapy;32 patients (71.1%) received a prior autologous stem cell transplant. All patients were refractory to an anti-CD38 Ab;6.7% were triple-refractory, 33.3% were quad-refractory, and 53.3% were penta-refractory. REGN5458 was escalated in cohorts from 3−96 mg over six dose levels. The median duration of follow-up was 2.37 months (range, 0.7−12.3). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) include cytokine release syndrome (CRS;37.8%), fatigue (17.8%), nausea (17.8%), and myalgias (13.3%). CRS occurred primarily during the initial doses and was Grade (Gr) 1 in 88.2% of patients. No patients had Gr >3 CRS. Infusion-related reactions occurred in 6.7% of patients. Infection-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 46.7% of patients (Gr ≥3 20%). Gr >3 treatment-related neurological events occurred in one patient (Gr 3 syncope 130 days after first infusion). Four patients discontinued due to AE with one patient having a TRAE (also DLT) of Gr 4 acute kidney injury. One patient had a DLT due to transient Gr 3 liver transaminases associated with CRS. Upon recovery, the patient continued study drug and has achieved ongoing partial remission. Gr >3 TRAEs occurred in 28.9% of patients, with the most common being anemia (8.9%) and lymphopenia (6.7%). Serious TRAEs occurred in 22.2% of patients, with the most common due to CRS (11.1%). Gr 5 AEs (all unrelated to study drug) occurred in three patients: two sepsis and one COVID-19. ORR was 35.6% across all dose levels (60% in highest dose level), with 81.3% of responders achieving at least a very good partial response;31.3% had a complete response (CR) or stringent CR. A total of 43.8% of responders had a DOR >4 months and 18.8% had a DOR >8 months. The ORR in patients with extramedullary plasmacytomas was 16.7%. Additional efficacy, PK, and biomarker data will be available at the time of presentation. Conclusions In this updated analysis of the first-in-human study, REGN5458 continues to show an acceptable safety profile and durable efficacy in heavily pre-treated patients with RRMM. Enrollment in the Phase 1 dose escalation portion is ongoing, and the Phase 2 portion of the study is recruiting. Disclosures: Madduri: Janssen: Consultancy, Honora ia;Foundation Medicine: Consultancy, Honoraria;Legend: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaking Engagement, Speakers Bureau;Kinevant: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaking Engagement, Speakers Bureau;GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaking Engagement, Speakers Bureau;AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria;Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria;Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Brayer: Janssen: Consultancy;Bristol-Myers Squibb, WindMIL Therapeutics: Research Funding;Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Zonder: Prothena: Consultancy;BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding;Caelum: Consultancy;Oncopeptide: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees;Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees;Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Personal fees;Alnylam: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees;Intellia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees;Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees;Celgene: Research Funding. Bensinger: Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Li: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Xu: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Adriaens: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Patents & Royalties: Dosing regime that mitigates cytokine release syndrome for therapeutic antibodies (status: pending). Chokshi: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zhang: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Boyapati: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sharma: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Seebach: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sirulnik: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Weinreich: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Yancopoulos: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Dhodapkar: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other;Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other;Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other;Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other;Roche/Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other;Lava Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other. Lentzsch: Mesoblast: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months;Caelum Biosciences: Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Celularity: Consultancy, Other;Janssen: Consultancy;Karyopharm: Research Funding;Magenta: Current equity holder in private company. Jagannath: MS, Janssen, Karyopharm, Legend Biotech, Sanofi, Takeda: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: The data described in the abstract will report on use of REGN5458 in a first-in-human trial in patients with multiple myeloma.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Very little is known about the risk that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral infection poses to cancer patients, many of whom are immune compromised causing them to be more susceptible to a host of infections. As a precautionary measure, many clinical studies halted enrollment during the initial surge of the global Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic. In this case report, we detail the successful treatment of a relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patient treated with an anti-B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy immediately following clinical recovery from COVID-19. CASE PRESENTATION: The 57 year old Caucasian male patient had a 4-year history of MM and was considered penta-refractory upon presentation for CAR T cell therapy. He had a history of immunosuppression and received one dose of lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC) the day prior to COVID-19 diagnosis; this patient was able to mount a substantial immune response against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and antiviral antibodies remain detectable 2 months after receiving anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy. The recent SARS-CoV-2 infection in this patient did not exacerbate CAR T-associated cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and conversely the CAR T cell therapy did not result in COVID-19-related complications. One month after CAR T cell infusion, the patient was assessed to have an unconfirmed partial response per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. CONCLUSION: Our case adds important context around treatment choice for MM patients in the era of COVID-19 and whether CAR T therapy can be administered to patients who have recovered from COVID-19. As the COVID-19 global pandemic continues, the decision of whether to proceed with CAR T cell therapy will require extensive discussion weighing the potential risks and benefits of therapy. This case suggests that it is possible to successfully complete anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy after recovery from COVID-19. CRB-402 study registered 6 September 2017 at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03274219).
Subject(s)
B-Cell Maturation Antigen/immunology , COVID-19/physiopathology , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , COVID-19 Serological Testing , Cough , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Disease Progression , Fever , Hospitalization , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Vidarabine/analogs & derivatives , Vidarabine/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Context: The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has resulted in over 100,000 deaths in the United States. Our institution has treated over 2,000 COVID-19 patients during the pandemic in New York City. Objective: We explored the population of myeloma patients who developed COVID-19 to identify risk factors tied to poor outcomes. Design: We performed a retrospective study of a cohort of 58 patients with a plasma cell disorder (54 MM, 4 smoldering MM) who developed COVID-19 between March 1, 2020 and April 30, 2020. We report epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory characteristics, including persistence of viral detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing, treatments initiated, and outcomes. Setting: A large tertiary care cancer center in New York at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA. Patients: Patient charts were analyzed retrospectively. Patients had MM or SMM and COVID-19. Results: Of the 58 patients diagnosed with COVID-19, 36 were hospitalized and 22 were managed at home. The median age was 67 years;52% of patients were male, and 63% were non-white. Hypertension (64%), hyperlipidemia (62%), obesity (37%), diabetes mellitus (28%), chronic kidney disease (CKD, 24%), and lung disease (21%) were the most common comorbidities. In the total cohort, 14 patients (24%) died. Older age (>70 years), male sex, and cardiovascular risk were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with hospitalization. Among hospitalized patients, laboratory findings demonstrated elevation of traditional inflammatory markers (CRP, ferritin, D-dimer) and a significant (p < 0.05) association between elevated inflammatory markers, severe hypogammaglobulinemia, non-white race, and mortality. Ninety-six percent (22/23) of patients developed antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 at a median of 32 days after initial diagnosis. Median time to PCR negativity was 43 (range 19–68) days from initial positive PCR. Conclusions: Drug exposure and MM disease status at the time of contracting COVID-19 had no bearing on patient outcome. Mounting a severe inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 and severe hypogammaglobulinemia were associated with higher mortality. These findings pave a path to the identification of vulnerable patients who need early intervention to improve outcomes of myeloma patients in future outbreaks of COVID-19. The majority of myeloma patients mounted a specific antibody response to SARS-CoV-2.